A Logic-style Version of Interactive Proofs
نویسنده
چکیده
Interactive proofs are de ned in terms of a conversation between two Turing machines, the prover and the veri er. We de ne an equivalent kind of proof in terms more usual for logic: our proofs are derivations from axioms by rules of inference. Namely, we consider proofs in formal arithmetic extended by some additional rule that uses random numbers. Such a proof can be considerably shorter than any proof of the same formula in arithmetic (however, a proof in the randomized system is allowed to have a small probability of error). This kind of proof is a special case of Arthur-Merlin proofs: Merlin generates a proof, Arthur supplies random numbers and checks the proof. On the other hand, we show that if a language L belongs to PSPACE then membership in L has polynomially long proofs in our system. This result, together with the well-known equality IP =PSPACE, shows equivalence in power between interactive proofs and polynomially long proofs in our extension of arithmetic.y yCopyright c 1996 Evgeny Dantsin. This technical report and other technical reports in this series can be obtained at ftp.csd.uu.se in the directory pub/papers/reports or at http://www.csd.uu.se/~thomas/reports.html. Some reports can be updated from time to time, check one of these addresses for the latest version. Section
منابع مشابه
A Probabilistic Hoare-style logic for Game-based Cryptographic Proofs (Extended Version)
We extend a Probabilistic Hoare-style logic to formalize game-based cryptographic proofs. Our approach provides a systematic and rigorous framework, thus preventing errors from being introduced. We illustrate our technique by proving semantic security of ElGamal.
متن کاملImplementing the Zc Logic in
Henson and Reeves have recently proposed a new kernel logic, Z C HR98b, HR98a] for the Z Spi89] speciication language. They have proved that their logic is sound and have shown how a complete schema calculus can be derived within the logic. An important next step is to investigate the practicality of the logic, to determine whether it could be used to reason about typical Z speciications in a p...
متن کاملResolution for Intuitionistic Logic1
Most automated theorem provers have been built around some version of resolution [4]. But resolution is an inherently Classical logic technique. Attempts to extend the method to other logics have tended to obscure its simplicity. In this paper we present a resolution style theorem prover for Intuitionistic logic that, we believe, retains many of the attractive features of Classical resolution. ...
متن کاملUsing a SAT Solver as a Fast Decision Procedure for Propositional Logic in an LCF-style Theorem Prover
This paper describes the integration of a leading SAT solver with Isabelle/HOL, a popular interactive theorem prover. The SAT solver generates resolution-style proofs for (instances of) propositional tautologies. These proofs are verified by the theorem prover. The presented approach significantly improves Isabelle’s performance on propositional problems, and furthermore exhibits counterexample...
متن کاملAn LCF-Style Interface between HOL and First-Order Logic
Performing interactive proof in the HOL theorem prover [3] involves reducing goals to simpler subgoals. It turns out that many of these subgoals can be efficiently ‘finished off’ by an automatic first-order prover. To fill this niche, Harrison implemented a version of the MESON procedure [4] with the ability to translate proofs to higher-order logic. This was integrated as a HOL tactic in 1996,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996